↓ Skip to main content

Whole-body cryostimulation as an effective method of reducing low-grade inflammation in obese men

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Physiological Sciences, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 321)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Whole-body cryostimulation as an effective method of reducing low-grade inflammation in obese men
Published in
The Journal of Physiological Sciences, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12576-013-0269-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ewa Ziemann, Robert A. Olek, Tomasz Grzywacz, Jędrzej Antosiewicz, Sylwester Kujach, Marcin Łuszczyk, Mirosław Smaruj, Ewelina Śledziewska, Radosław Laskowski

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate anti-inflammatory effect of the whole body cryostimulation in obese men. Fourteen subjects (BMI >30 kg m(-2)), divided into two subgroups according to cardiorespiratory fitness: higher (HCF) or lower (LCF), have been exposed to 10 sessions in a cryogenic chamber (-110 °C). Blood samples were collected before, 30 min and 24 h after the first, fifth and last cryostimulation. Coldness exposures affected blood cytokine profile; however, the response depended on subjects' fitness capacity. Concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the LCF decreased by 19, 6.8, and 7.4 % in IL-6, resistin, and visfatin, respectively. TNFα in the LCF dropped 4.3-fold compared to baseline, while in the HCF, changes were smaller, yet significant. Anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 increased in both groups. No changes in adiponectin and leptin were observed in either group. Obtained results suggest that whole body cryostimulation can be a supplementary method for obese in reducing systemic inflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 24%
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Sports and Recreations 6 13%
Mathematics 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2013.
All research outputs
#3,867,155
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#31
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,221
of 200,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them