| Title |
A novel fluorescent protein purified from eel muscle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fisheries Science, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12562-009-0176-z |
| Authors |
Seiichi Hayashi, Yoshifumi Toda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,123,659
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries Science
#8
of 791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,110
of 93,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 791 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them