↓ Skip to main content

An automated software reliability prediction system for safety critical software

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
An automated software reliability prediction system for safety critical software
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10664-015-9412-6
Authors

Xiang Li, Chetan Mutha, Carol S. Smidts

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Student > Master 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 40%
Engineering 5 33%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2017.
All research outputs
#20,390,619
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#625
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,319
of 386,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.