You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proteins behaving badly: emerging technologies in profiling biopharmaceutical aggregation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Biotechnology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.05.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zahra Hamrang, Nicholas J.W. Rattray, Alain Pluen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 58 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 30 | 13% |
| Engineering | 26 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2013.
All research outputs
#14,276,973
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biotechnology
#2,362
of 2,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,800
of 210,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biotechnology
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.