↓ Skip to main content

Early-Life Air Pollution and Asthma Risk in Minority Children. The GALA II and SAGE II Studies

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early-Life Air Pollution and Asthma Risk in Minority Children. The GALA II and SAGE II Studies
Published in
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1164/rccm.201302-0264oc
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine K. Nishimura, Joshua M. Galanter, Lindsey A. Roth, Sam S. Oh, Neeta Thakur, Elizabeth A. Nguyen, Shannon Thyne, Harold J. Farber, Denise Serebrisky, Rajesh Kumar, Emerita Brigino-Buenaventura, Adam Davis, Michael A. LeNoir, Kelley Meade, William Rodriguez-Cintron, Pedro C. Avila, Luisa N. Borrell, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, Jose R. Rodriguez-Santana, Śaunak Sen, Fred Lurmann, John R. Balmes, Esteban G. Burchard

Abstract

Air pollution is a known asthma trigger and has been associated with short-term asthma symptoms, airway inflammation, decreased lung function, and reduced response to asthma rescue medications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 181 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 32 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 30%
Environmental Science 20 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 49 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#350,737
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#233
of 12,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,452
of 210,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#2
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.