↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Human Papillomavirus Antibodies and Risk of Subsequent Head and Neck Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
37 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of Human Papillomavirus Antibodies and Risk of Subsequent Head and Neck Cancer
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2013
DOI 10.1200/jco.2012.47.2738
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aimée R. Kreimer, Mattias Johansson, Tim Waterboer, Rudolf Kaaks, Jenny Chang-Claude, Dagmar Drogen, Anne Tjønneland, Kim Overvad, J. Ramón Quirós, Carlos A. González, Maria José Sánchez, Nerea Larrañaga, Carmen Navarro, Aurelio Barricarte, Ruth C. Travis, Kay-Tee Khaw, Nick Wareham, Antonia Trichopoulou, Pagona Lagiou, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Petra H.M. Peeters, Salvatore Panico, Giovanna Masala, Sara Grioni, Rosario Tumino, Paolo Vineis, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Göran Laurell, Göran Hallmans, Jonas Manjer, Johanna Ekström, Guri Skeie, Eiliv Lund, Elisabete Weiderpass, Pietro Ferrari, Graham Byrnes, Isabelle Romieu, Elio Riboli, Allan Hildesheim, Heiner Boeing, Michael Pawlita, Paul Brennan

Abstract

Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) infection is causing an increasing number of oropharyngeal cancers in the United States and Europe. The aim of our study was to investigate whether HPV antibodies are associated with head and neck cancer risk when measured in prediagnostic sera. We identified 638 participants with incident head and neck cancers (patients; 180 oral cancers, 135 oropharynx cancers, and 247 hypopharynx/larynx cancers) and 300 patients with esophageal cancers as well as 1,599 comparable controls from within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. Prediagnostic plasma samples from patients (collected, on average, 6 years before diagnosis) and control participants were analyzed for antibodies against multiple proteins of HPV16 as well as HPV6, HPV11, HPV18, HPV31, HPV33, HPV45, and HPV52. Odds ratios (ORs) of cancer and 95% CIs were calculated, adjusting for potential confounders. All-cause mortality was evaluated among patients using Cox proportional hazards regression. HPV16 E6 seropositivity was present in prediagnostic samples for 34.8% of patients with oropharyngeal cancer and 0.6% of controls (OR, 274; 95% CI, 110 to 681) but was not associated with other cancer sites. The increased risk of oropharyngeal cancer among HPV16 E6 seropositive participants was independent of time between blood collection and diagnosis and was observed more than 10 years before diagnosis. The all-cause mortality ratio among patients with oropharyngeal cancer was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.67), for patients who were HPV16 E6 seropositive compared with seronegative. HPV16 E6 seropositivity was present more than 10 years before diagnosis of oropharyngeal cancers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 276 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 18%
Researcher 40 14%
Student > Master 32 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Other 20 7%
Other 68 24%
Unknown 51 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 136 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 63 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#273,778
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#496
of 22,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,790
of 209,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#4
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.