You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
FORUM: Sharing or sparing? How should we grow the world's cities?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12118 |
| Authors |
Brenda B. Lin, Richard A. Fuller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 38% |
| Australia | 2 | 15% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Faroe Islands | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Singapore | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 402 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 96 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 76 | 17% |
| Unknown | 63 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 147 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 137 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 4% |
| Design | 9 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 7% |
| Unknown | 89 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,809,667
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#1,580
of 4,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,304
of 210,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#17
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.