You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Audiology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3109/14992027.2013.776181 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elaine Hoi Ning Ng, Mary Rudner, Thomas Lunner, Michael Syskind Pedersen, Jerker Rönnberg |
| Abstract |
It has been shown that noise reduction algorithms can reduce the negative effects of noise on memory processing in persons with normal hearing. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether a similar effect can be obtained for persons with hearing impairment and whether such an effect is dependent on individual differences in working memory capacity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 237 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 21% |
| Researcher | 45 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 18% |
| Unknown | 52 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 55 | 23% |
| Engineering | 28 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Unknown | 69 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,340,605
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Audiology
#1,178
of 1,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,403
of 199,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Audiology
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.