You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Eating patterns and type 2 diabetes risk in older women: breakfast consumption and eating frequency 1 , 2 , 3
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.112.057521 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rania A Mekary, Edward Giovannucci, Leah Cahill, Walter C Willett, Rob M van Dam, Frank B Hu |
| Abstract |
Little is known about the association between eating patterns and type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk in women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 33% |
| United States | 7 | 23% |
| Australia | 3 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 27% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 77 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 9% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Unknown | 87 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#304,274
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#758
of 12,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,016
of 210,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#9
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.