You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of HapMap and 1000 Genomes Reference Panels in a Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0167742 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul S. de Vries, Maria Sabater-Lleal, Daniel I. Chasman, Stella Trompet, Tarunveer S. Ahluwalia, Alexander Teumer, Marcus E. Kleber, Ming-Huei Chen, Jie Jin Wang, John R. Attia, Riccardo E. Marioni, Maristella Steri, Lu-Chen Weng, Rene Pool, Vera Grossmann, Jennifer A. Brody, Cristina Venturini, Toshiko Tanaka, Lynda M. Rose, Christopher Oldmeadow, Johanna Mazur, Saonli Basu, Mattias Frånberg, Qiong Yang, Symen Ligthart, Jouke J. Hottenga, Ann Rumley, Antonella Mulas, Anton J. M. de Craen, Anne Grotevendt, Kent D. Taylor, Graciela E. Delgado, Annette Kifley, Lorna M. Lopez, Tina L. Berentzen, Massimo Mangino, Stefania Bandinelli, Alanna C. Morrison, Anders Hamsten, Geoffrey Tofler, Moniek P. M. de Maat, Harmen H. M. Draisma, Gordon D. Lowe, Magdalena Zoledziewska, Naveed Sattar, Karl J. Lackner, Uwe Völker, Barbara McKnight, Jie Huang, Elizabeth G. Holliday, Mark A. McEvoy, John M. Starr, Pirro G. Hysi, Dena G. Hernandez, Weihua Guan, Fernando Rivadeneira, Wendy L. McArdle, P. Eline Slagboom, Tanja Zeller, Bruce M. Psaty, André G. Uitterlinden, Eco J. C. de Geus, David J. Stott, Harald Binder, Albert Hofman, Oscar H. Franco, Jerome I. Rotter, Luigi Ferrucci, Tim D. Spector, Ian J. Deary, Winfried März, Andreas Greinacher, Philipp S. Wild, Francesco Cucca, Dorret I. Boomsma, Hugh Watkins, Weihong Tang, Paul M. Ridker, Jan W. Jukema, Rodney J. Scott, Paul Mitchell, Torben Hansen, Christopher J. O'Donnell, Nicholas L. Smith, David P. Strachan, Abbas Dehghan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| China | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
| Scientists | 9 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,699,563
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#32,941
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,762
of 427,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#705
of 4,305 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,305 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.