↓ Skip to main content

Zika virus in the testes: should we be worried?

Overview of attention for article published in Protein & Cell, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Zika virus in the testes: should we be worried?
Published in
Protein & Cell, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13238-016-0357-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gary Wong, Shihua Li, Lei Liu, Yingxia Liu, Yuhai Bi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 26%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2017.
All research outputs
#18,518,987
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Protein & Cell
#560
of 741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,984
of 418,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein & Cell
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.