| Title |
Development of the SIOPE DIPG network, registry and imaging repository: a collaborative effort to optimize research into a rare and lethal disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11060-016-2363-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie E. M. Veldhuijzen van Zanten, Joshua Baugh, Brooklyn Chaney, Dennis De Jongh, Esther Sanchez Aliaga, Frederik Barkhof, Johan Noltes, Ruben De Wolf, Jet Van Dijk, Antonio Cannarozzo, Carin M. Damen-Korbijn, Jan A. Lieverst, Niclas Colditz, Marion Hoffmann, Monika Warmuth-Metz, Brigitte Bison, David T. W. Jones, Dominik Sturm, Gerrit H. Gielen, Chris Jones, Esther Hulleman, Raphael Calmon, David Castel, Pascale Varlet, Géraldine Giraud, Irene Slavc, Stefaan Van Gool, Sandra Jacobs, Filip Jadrijevic-Cvrlje, David Sumerauer, Karsten Nysom, Virve Pentikainen, Sanna-Maria Kivivuori, Pierre Leblond, Natasha Entz-Werle, Andre O. von Bueren, Antonis Kattamis, Darren R. Hargrave, Péter Hauser, Miklos Garami, Halldora K. Thorarinsdottir, Jane Pears, Lorenza Gandola, Giedre Rutkauskiene, Geert O. Janssens, Ingrid K. Torsvik, Marta Perek-Polnik, Maria J. Gil-da-Costa, Olga Zheludkova, Liudmila Shats, Ladislav Deak, Lidija Kitanovski, Ofelia Cruz, Andres Morales La Madrid, Stefan Holm, Nicolas Gerber, Rejin Kebudi, Richard Grundy, Enrique Lopez-Aguilar, Marta Zapata-Tarres, John Emmerik, Tim Hayden, Simon Bailey, Veronica Biassoni, Maura Massimino, Jacques Grill, William P. Vandertop, Gertjan J. L. Kaspers, Maryam Fouladi, Christof M. Kramm, Dannis G. van Vuurden, on behalf of the members of the SIOPE DIPG Network |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| Australia | 3 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 24% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2017.
All research outputs
#4,259,644
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#364
of 3,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,837
of 425,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,302 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.