↓ Skip to main content

Blood pressure regulation IX: cerebral autoregulation under blood pressure challenges

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
Title
Blood pressure regulation IX: cerebral autoregulation under blood pressure challenges
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00421-013-2667-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu-Chieh Tzeng, Philip N. Ainslie

Abstract

Cerebral autoregulation (CA) is integral to the delicate process of maintaining stable cerebral perfusion and brain tissue oxygenation against changes in arterial blood pressure. The last four decades has seen dramatic advances in understanding CA physiology, and the role that CA might play in the causation and progression of disease processes that affect the cerebral circulation such as stroke. However, the translation of these basic scientific advances into clinical practice has been limited by the maintenance of old constructs and because there are persistent gaps in our understanding of how this vital vascular mechanism should be quantified. In this review, we re-evaluate relevant studies that challenge established paradigms about how the cerebral perfusion pressure and blood flow are related. In the context of blood pressure being a major haemodynamic challenge to the cerebral circulation, we conclude that: (1) the physiological properties of CA remain inconclusive, (2) many extant methods for CA characterisation are based on simplistic assumptions that can give rise to misleading interpretations, and (3) robust evaluation of CA requires thorough consideration not only of active vasomotor function, but also the unique properties of the intracranial environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 263 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 18%
Researcher 43 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 51 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 34%
Engineering 25 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 7%
Neuroscience 19 7%
Sports and Recreations 12 4%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 62 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,328
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,559
of 209,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.