You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Genetics, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrg3457 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naomi R. Wray, Jian Yang, Ben J. Hayes, Alkes L. Price, Michael E. Goddard, Peter M. Visscher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 16% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 24 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 17 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 2% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Brazil | 7 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 30 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1228 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 377 | 28% |
| Researcher | 323 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 146 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 78 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 66 | 5% |
| Other | 204 | 15% |
| Unknown | 129 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 562 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 187 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 119 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 56 | 4% |
| Psychology | 47 | 4% |
| Other | 169 | 13% |
| Unknown | 183 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#705,894
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#379
of 2,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,224
of 212,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.