You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Network and Parallel Computing
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/b100357 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-54-023388-6, 978-3-54-030141-7
|
| Editors |
Jin, Hai, Gao, Guang R., Xu, Zhiwei, Chen, Hao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Researcher | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 93% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2012.
All research outputs
#4,733,586
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,572
of 8,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,355
of 133,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#32
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.