↓ Skip to main content

Marine reserves: long-term protection is required for full recovery of predatory fish populations

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
375 Mendeley
Title
Marine reserves: long-term protection is required for full recovery of predatory fish populations
Published in
Oecologia, January 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00442-003-1456-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Garry R. Russ, Angel C. Alcala

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Brazil 5 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 343 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 82 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 21%
Student > Master 67 18%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Other 23 6%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 36 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 178 47%
Environmental Science 107 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 4%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 1%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 47 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,774
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,299
of 145,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.