↓ Skip to main content

Heparin‐binding protein (HBP): an early marker of respiratory failure after trauma?

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heparin‐binding protein (HBP): an early marker of respiratory failure after trauma?
Published in
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, January 2013
DOI 10.1111/aas.12070
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. JOHANSSON, O. BRATTSTRÖM, F. SJÖBERG, L. LINDBOM, H. HERWALD, E. WEITZBERG, A. OLDNER

Abstract

Trauma and its complications contribute to morbidity and mortality in the general population. Trauma victims are susceptible to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and sepsis. Polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMNs) are activated after trauma and there is substantial evidence of their involvement in the development of ARDS. Activated PMNs release heparin-binding protein (HBP), a granule protein previously shown to be involved in acute inflammatory reactions. We hypothesised that there is an increase in plasma HBP content after trauma and that the increased levels are related to the severity of the trauma or later development of severe sepsis and organ failure (ARDS).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Romania 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 9 27%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 64%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2013.
All research outputs
#16,104,120
of 24,704,144 outputs
Outputs from Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
#1,370
of 1,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,571
of 295,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,704,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,997 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.