Title |
A second fundamental model for resonance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, June 1983
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf01234306 |
Authors |
J. Henrard, A. Lemaitre |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 33% |
Researcher | 4 | 19% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 15 | 71% |
Engineering | 2 | 10% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,596,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
#147
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,051
of 7,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them