↓ Skip to main content

Dynamics of two satellites in the 2/1 Mean–Motion resonance: application to the case of Enceladus and Dione

Overview of attention for article published in Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Dynamics of two satellites in the 2/1 Mean–Motion resonance: application to the case of Enceladus and Dione
Published in
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, April 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10569-007-9066-9
Authors

N. Callegari, T. Yokoyama

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Master 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 83%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,107,914
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
#129
of 504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,374
of 77,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them