↓ Skip to main content

Medical complexity and time to lung cancer treatment – a three-year retrospective chart review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Medical complexity and time to lung cancer treatment – a three-year retrospective chart review
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12913-016-1952-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trine Stokstad, Sveinung Sørhaug, Tore Amundsen, Bjørn H. Grønberg

Abstract

The time from a referral for suspected lung cancer is received at a hospital until treatment start has been defined as a quality indicator. Current Norwegian recommendation is that ≥70% should start surgery or radiotherapy within 42 calendar days and systemic therapy within 35 days. However, delays can occur due to medical complexity. The aim of this study was to quantify the proportion of patients who started treatment within the recommended timeframes; and to assess the proportion of non-complex patients for which there were no good reasons for delays. We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with lung cancer at a university hospital during 2011-2013. We defined "non-complex" patients as those who underwent ≤1 tissue diagnostic procedure and had no delays due to comorbidity, intercurrent disease or complications to diagnostic procedures ("Medical delays") of more than three days. Four hundred forty-nine cases were analyzed; 142 (32%) had >1 tissue diagnostic procedures; 67 (15%) had medical delays >3 days; 262 (58%) were non-complex and 363 (81%) received treatment for lung cancer. Median number of days until surgery or radiotherapy was 48 (overall) and 41 (non-complex patients). The proportions who started surgery or radiotherapy within 42 days were 41% (overall) and 56% (non-complex). Corresponding numbers for systemic therapy were 29 days (overall) and 25 days (non-complex), and 64% (overall) and 80% (non-complex). Fewer lung cancer patients than desired started treatment within the recommended timeframes. Even among the least complex patients, too few patients received timely treatment. The reasons need to be identified and understood, and changes in the organization appear to be necessary in order to offer timely treatment to more patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 16%
Student > Master 4 16%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 11 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,503,829
of 24,805,946 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,084
of 8,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,208
of 428,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#29
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,805,946 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.