↓ Skip to main content

Border malaria in China: knowledge and use of personal protection by minority populations and implications for malaria control: a questionnaire-based survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Border malaria in China: knowledge and use of personal protection by minority populations and implications for malaria control: a questionnaire-based survey
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-8-344
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah J Moore, Xia Min, Nigel Hill, Caroline Jones, Zhang Zaixing, Mary M Cameron

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 73 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Master 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 13%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,937
of 14,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,022
of 89,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#20
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.