| Title |
Emerging causes of traveler’s diarrhea: Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora, Isospora, and Microsporidia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Infectious Disease Reports, February 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11908-003-0067-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Goodgame |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 31% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,948,808
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#104
of 495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,743
of 129,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them