| Title |
A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-211 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jack Chen, Lixin Ou, Stephanie J Hollis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Peru | 1 | 11% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 488 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 481 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 81 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 12% |
| Other | 41 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 7% |
| Other | 102 | 21% |
| Unknown | 108 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 169 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 58 | 12% |
| Psychology | 21 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 73 | 15% |
| Unknown | 135 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,826,538
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,765
of 8,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,902
of 211,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#20
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.