↓ Skip to main content

Tipping the redox balance of oxidative stress in fibrogenic pathways in chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Tipping the redox balance of oxidative stress in fibrogenic pathways in chronic kidney disease
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00467-009-1199-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daryl M. Okamura, Jonathan Himmelfarb

Abstract

Patients with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease have a greatly increased cardiovascular risk that cannot be explained entirely by traditional cardiovascular risk factors. An increase in oxidative stress and inflammation have been proposed as nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors in this patient population. Oxidative stress reflects the redox balance between oxidant generation and antioxidant mechanisms. The generation of reactive oxygen species is not simply a random process that oxidizes nearby macromolecules, but, in many instances, the oxidants target particular amino acid residues or lipid moieties. Oxidant mechanisms are now recognized to be intimately involved in cell signaling and to be vital components of the immune response. This is equally true for antioxidant mechanisms as well. In the progression of chronic kidney disease, the redox balance is not in equilibrium and is tipped toward oxidation, resulting in the dysregulation of cellular process and subsequent tissue injury. In this review we discuss the major oxidant and antioxidant pathways and the biomarkers to assess redox status. We also review the data linking the pathogenesis of oxidative stress, inflammation, and the progressive loss of kidney function in chronic kidney disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
China 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 28 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 23%
Professor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,863,368
of 25,177,382 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,610
of 4,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,840
of 99,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,177,382 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.