| Title |
Why ant pollination is rare: new evidence and implications of the antibiotic hypothesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthropod-Plant Interactions, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11829-012-9201-8 |
| Authors |
Emily M. Dutton, Megan E. Frederickson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
| Scientists | 6 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,865,333
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Arthropod-Plant Interactions
#20
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,061
of 164,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthropod-Plant Interactions
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them