| Title |
Assessing psychological well-being: self-report instruments for the NIH Toolbox
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-013-0452-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John M. Salsman, Jin-Shei Lai, Hugh C. Hendrie, Zeeshan Butt, Nicholas Zill, Paul A. Pilkonis, Christopher Peterson, Catherine M. Stoney, Pim Brouwers, David Cella |
| Abstract |
Psychological well-being (PWB) has a significant relationship with physical and mental health. As a part of the NIH Toolbox for the Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function, we developed self-report item banks and short forms to assess PWB. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Comoros | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 42 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 54 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 52 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2013.
All research outputs
#5,860,631
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#538
of 2,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,549
of 178,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,841 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.