| Title |
Perspectives on the Use of Green Infrastructure for Stormwater Management in Cleveland and Milwaukee
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Management, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00267-013-0032-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa Keeley, Althea Koburger, David P. Dolowitz, Dale Medearis, Darla Nickel, William Shuster |
| Abstract |
Green infrastructure is a general term referring to the management of landscapes in ways that generate human and ecosystem benefits. Many municipalities have begun to utilize green infrastructure in efforts to meet stormwater management goals. This study examines challenges to integrating gray and green infrastructure for stormwater management, informed by interviews with practitioners in Cleveland, OH and Milwaukee WI. Green infrastructure in these cities is utilized under conditions of extreme fiscal austerity and its use presents opportunities to connect stormwater management with urban revitalization and economic recovery while planning for the effects of negative- or zero-population growth. In this context, specific challenges in capturing the multiple benefits of green infrastructure exist because the projects required to meet federally mandated stormwater management targets and the needs of urban redevelopment frequently differ in scale and location. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Jordan | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 368 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 84 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 16% |
| Researcher | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 13% |
| Unknown | 90 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 94 | 25% |
| Engineering | 63 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 9% |
| Design | 17 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 10% |
| Unknown | 114 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,525,716
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#242
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,670
of 210,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.