↓ Skip to main content

Rapid and simple method for determination of hexabromocyclododecanes and other LC–MS–MS-amenable brominated flame retardants in fish

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Rapid and simple method for determination of hexabromocyclododecanes and other LC–MS–MS-amenable brominated flame retardants in fish
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00216-013-7076-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darina Lankova, Michala Kockovska, Ondrej Lacina, Kamila Kalachova, Jana Pulkrabova, Jana Hajslova

Abstract

In this study, a novel analytical approach for simultaneous determination of hexabromocyclododecane isomers (HBCDs), tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA), three brominated phenols, and four hydroxylated derivatives of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (OH-PBDEs) was developed and validated for muscle tissue of both lean and fatty fish. The rapid, simple, and high-throughput sample-preparation procedure was based on acetonitrile extraction then purification by dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE) with a combination of C18 and primary-secondary amine (PSA) sorbents. Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (MS-MS) was used for identification and quantification of the analytes. Method recovery for both matrices ranged from 80 to 115% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) <13% for all analytes. Limits of quantification (LOQs) were in the range 0.1-1 μg kg(-1) wet weight. The validated method was used for analysis of brominated compounds in 32 fish and five bivalve samples collected from different European markets within the monitoring survey organized in the framework of the CONffIDENCE project. Of the 12 targeted analytes, only α-HBCD, 2,4-dibromophenol (2,4-DBP), and 2,4,6-tribromophenol (2,4,6-TBP) were quantified in the samples. α-HBCD was found in six fish samples (herring and mackerel) in the range of 0.8-2.5 μg kg(-1) wet weight. 2,4-DBP and 2,4,6-TBP were found in three blue mussel samples in the range of 19.6-43.5 and 2.3-7.5 μg kg(-1) wet weight, respectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 30%
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Master 6 16%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 24%
Environmental Science 7 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,975
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,995
of 197,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#23
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.