You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dermoscopic Evaluation of Nodular Melanoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Dermatology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.2466 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott W. Menzies, Fergal J. Moloney, Karen Byth, Michelle Avramidis, Giuseppe Argenziano, Iris Zalaudek, Ralph P. Braun, Josep Malvehy, Susana Puig, Harold S. Rabinovitz, Margaret Oliviero, Horacio Cabo, Riccardo Bono, Maria A. Pizzichetta, Magdalena Claeson, Daniel C. Gaffney, H. Peter Soyer, Ignazio Stanganelli, Richard A. Scolyer, Pascale Guitera, John Kelly, Olivia McCurdy, Alex Llambrich, Ashfaq A. Marghoob, Pedro Zaballos, Herbert M. Kirchesch, Domenico Piccolo, Jonathan Bowling, Luc Thomas, Karin Terstappen, Masaru Tanaka, Giovanni Pellacani, Gianluca Pagnanelli, Giovanni Ghigliotti, Blanca Carlos Ortega, Greg Crafter, Ana María Perusquía Ortiz, Isabelle Tromme, Isil Kilinc Karaarslan, Fezal Ozdemir, Anthony Tam, Christian Landi, Peter Norton, Nida Kaçar, Lidia Rudnicka, Monika Slowinska, Olga Simionescu, Alessandro Di Stefani, Elliot Coates, Juergen Kreusch |
| Abstract |
Nodular melanoma (NM) is a rapidly progressing potentially lethal skin tumor for which early diagnosis is critical. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 22 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 48% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,760,001
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Dermatology
#2,350
of 6,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,631
of 206,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Dermatology
#19
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.