↓ Skip to main content

Using the product environmental footprint for supply chain management: lessons learned from a case study on pork

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Using the product environmental footprint for supply chain management: lessons learned from a case study on pork
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11367-016-1249-8
Authors

Lasse Six, Bruno De Wilde, Frederic Vermeiren, Steven Van Hemelryck, Mieke Vercaeren, Alessandra Zamagni, Paolo Masoni, Jo Dewulf, Steven De Meester

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 163 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 54 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 23 14%
Environmental Science 21 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 19 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 10%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 64 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,272,753
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#357
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,762
of 424,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.