You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patient safety in remote primary care encounters: multimethod qualitative study combining Safety I and Safety II analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016674 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rebecca Payne, Aileen Clarke, Nadia Swann, Jackie van Dael, Natassia Brenman, Rebecca Rosen, Adam Mackridge, Lucy Moore, Asli Kalin, Emma Ladds, Nina Hemmings, Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt, Stuart Faulkner, Isabel Hanson, Sophie Spitters, Sietse Wieringa, Francesca H Dakin, Sara E Shaw, Joseph Wherton, Richard Byng, Laiba Husain, Trisha Greenhalgh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 323 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 145 | 45% |
United States | 7 | 2% |
Australia | 7 | 2% |
Spain | 5 | 2% |
Canada | 5 | 2% |
Comoros | 2 | <1% |
Ireland | 2 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 2% |
Unknown | 141 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 204 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 66 | 20% |
Scientists | 46 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 33% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 19% |
Psychology | 2 | 10% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1466. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,376
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#2
of 2,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176
of 368,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.