↓ Skip to main content

Patient safety in remote primary care encounters: multimethod qualitative study combining Safety I and Safety II analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 2,073)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
174 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
118 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
4 Redditors
bluesky
4 Bluesky users
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Patient safety in remote primary care encounters: multimethod qualitative study combining Safety I and Safety II analysis
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, November 2023
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016674
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Lecturer 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 57 54%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Psychology 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 58 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1409. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2026.
All research outputs
#10,762
of 34,399,888 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#2
of 2,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225
of 455,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,399,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.