↓ Skip to main content

Midodrine for Orthostatic Hypotension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Midodrine for Orthostatic Hypotension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11606-013-2520-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ajay K. Parsaik, Balwinder Singh, Osama Altayar, Soniya S. Mascarenhas, Shannon K. Singh, Patricia J. Erwin, M. Hassan Murad

Abstract

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of midodrine in orthostatic hypotension (OH).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,686,573
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,140
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,616
of 199,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#37
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.