↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Adjusting foraging strategies: a comparison of rural and urban common mynas (Acridotheres tristis)

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: Adjusting foraging strategies: a comparison of rural and urban common mynas (Acridotheres tristis)
Published in
Animal Cognition, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10071-017-1070-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ira G. Federspiel, Alexis Garland, David Guez, Thomas Bugnyar, Susan D. Healy, Onur Güntürkün, Andrea S. Griffin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Professor 3 15%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 35%
Psychology 5 25%
Environmental Science 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#20,397,576
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,397
of 1,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#354,505
of 418,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.