↓ Skip to main content

Factors Affecting the Retention and Use of Child Health Cards in a Slum Community in Kampala, Uganda, 2005

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Factors Affecting the Retention and Use of Child Health Cards in a Slum Community in Kampala, Uganda, 2005
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10995-006-0132-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

David O. Mukanga, Sarah Kiguli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Psychology 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#839
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,667
of 67,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.