↓ Skip to main content

Creatine supplementation does not enhance submaximal aerobic training adaptations in healthy young men and women

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Creatine supplementation does not enhance submaximal aerobic training adaptations in healthy young men and women
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00421-006-0267-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. F. Reardon, P. A. Ruell, M. A. Fiatarone Singh, C. H. Thompson, K. B. Rooney

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 24%
Student > Bachelor 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 31 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,009
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,441
of 94,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.