You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Distance, dams and drift: what structures populations of an endangered, benthic stream fish?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Freshwater Biology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/fwb.12190 |
| Authors |
James H. Roberts, Paul L. Angermeier, Eric M. Hallerman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2014.
All research outputs
#14,028,365
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Freshwater Biology
#1,477
of 2,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,003
of 201,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Freshwater Biology
#8
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.