↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Wound Healing: A Review of Current Management and Treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
3 X users
patent
9 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1332 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2623 Mendeley
Title
Chronic Wound Healing: A Review of Current Management and Treatments
Published in
Advances in Therapy, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12325-017-0478-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Han, Roger Ceilley

Abstract

Wound healing is a complex, highly regulated process that is critical in maintaining the barrier function of skin. With numerous disease processes, the cascade of events involved in wound healing can be affected, resulting in chronic, non-healing wounds that subject the patient to significant discomfort and distress while draining the medical system of an enormous amount of resources. The healing of a superficial wound requires many factors to work in concert, and wound dressings and treatments have evolved considerably to address possible barriers to wound healing, ranging from infection to hypoxia. Even optimally, wound tissue never reaches its pre-injured strength and multiple aberrant healing states can result in chronic non-healing wounds. This article will review wound healing physiology and discuss current approaches for treating a wound.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,623 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Unknown 2621 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 342 13%
Student > Bachelor 339 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 282 11%
Researcher 197 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 122 5%
Other 354 13%
Unknown 987 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 280 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 258 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 179 7%
Engineering 161 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 127 5%
Other 539 21%
Unknown 1079 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#532,752
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#58
of 2,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,369
of 425,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.