| Title |
A Primer on Real Effective Exchange Rates: Determinants, Overvaluation, Trade Flows and Competitive Devaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Open Economies Review, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11079-006-5215-0 |
| Authors |
Menzie D. Chinn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 19% |
| Researcher | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 73 | 62% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,128,192
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Open Economies Review
#5
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,538
of 176,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Economies Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them