↓ Skip to main content

The Incidence of Hip Fracture in Four Asian Countries: The Asian Osteoporosis Study (AOS)

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, March 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
235 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
The Incidence of Hip Fracture in Four Asian Countries: The Asian Osteoporosis Study (AOS)
Published in
Osteoporosis International, March 2001
DOI 10.1007/s001980170135
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. M. C. Lau, J. K. Lee, P. Suriwongpaisal, S. M. Saw, S. Das De, A. Khir, P. Sambrook

Abstract

The Asian Osteoporosis Study (AOS) is the first multicenter study to document and compare the incidence of hip fracture in four Asian countries. Hosital discharge data for the year 1997 were obtained for the Hong Kong SAR, Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand (Chiang Mai). The number of patients who were 50 years of age and older and who were discharged with a diagnosis of hip fracture (ICD9 820) was enumerated. The age-specific incidence rates were deduced and were directly adjusted to the US white population in 1989. The age-adjusted rates for men and women (per 100,000) are as follows: Hong Kong, 180 and 459; Singapore, 164 and 442; Malaysia, 88 and 218; Thailand, 114 and 289; compared with US White rates of 187 in men and 535 in women, published in 1989. We conclude that there is moderate variation in the incidence of hip fracture among Asian countries. The rates were highest in urbanized countries. With rapid economic development in Asia, hip fracture will prove to be a major public health challenge.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2013.
All research outputs
#3,257,475
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#547
of 3,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,467
of 40,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.