↓ Skip to main content

Hepcidin, a putative mediator of anemia of inflammation, is a type II acute-phase protein

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
33 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hepcidin, a putative mediator of anemia of inflammation, is a type II acute-phase protein
Published in
Blood, November 2002
DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3235
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeta Nemeth, Erika V. Valore, Mary Territo, Gary Schiller, Alan Lichtenstein, Tomas Ganz

Abstract

Hepcidin is a liver-made peptide proposed to be a central regulator of intestinal iron absorption and iron recycling by macrophages. In animal models, hepcidin is induced by inflammation and iron loading, but its regulation in humans has not been studied. We report that urinary excretion of hepcidin was greatly increased in patients with iron overload, infections, or inflammatory diseases. Hepcidin excretion correlated well with serum ferritin levels, which are regulated by similar pathologic stimuli. In vitro iron loading of primary human hepatocytes, however, unexpectedly down-regulated hepcidin mRNA, suggesting that in vivo regulation of hepcidin expression by iron stores involves complex indirect effects. Hepcidin mRNA was dramatically induced by interleukin-6 (IL-6) in vitro, but not by IL-1 or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), demonstrating that human hepcidin is a type II acute-phase reactant. The linkage of hepcidin induction to inflammation in humans supports its proposed role as a key mediator of anemia of inflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 363 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 15%
Researcher 46 12%
Student > Master 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 8%
Other 92 25%
Unknown 68 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 2%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 77 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,202,253
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#2,226
of 33,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,655
of 55,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#6
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.