↓ Skip to main content

Approaches to Rationing Drugs in Hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Approaches to Rationing Drugs in Hospitals
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00019053-199610050-00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felix Bochner, Naomi G. Burgess, E. Dean Martin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 41%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Unspecified 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 9 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Psychology 5 15%
Unspecified 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#996
of 1,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,227
of 285,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#130
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.