↓ Skip to main content

Continuing Distance Education: A Capacity-Building Tool for the De-isolation of Care Professionals and Researchers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Continuing Distance Education: A Capacity-Building Tool for the De-isolation of Care Professionals and Researchers
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11606-013-2522-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheikh Oumar Bagayoko, Caroline Perrin, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Antoine Geissbuhler

Abstract

There are large disparities in access to health-care professionals (HCP) in low-income African countries, leading to imbalanced and suboptimal health delivery. Part of the difficulty is recruiting and retaining care professionals to work in isolated settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 23%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 24%
Computer Science 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 30 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2013.
All research outputs
#21,420,714
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#7,217
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,595
of 200,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#61
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.