↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2013

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2013
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12630-012-9820-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Merchant, Daniel Chartrand, Steven Dain, Gregory Dobson, Matthias Kurrek, Annie Lagacé, Shean Stacey, Barton Thiessen

Abstract

The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2013 (the guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. Because the guidelines are subject to revision, updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2013 supersedes all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the society cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Each anesthesiologist should exercise his or her own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 25 74%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 25 74%