↓ Skip to main content

Biological and social outcomes of antler point restriction harvest regulations for white‐tailed deer

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Monographs, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological and social outcomes of antler point restriction harvest regulations for white‐tailed deer
Published in
Wildlife Monographs, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/wmon.1022
Authors

Bret D. Wallingford, Duane R. Diefenbach, Eric S. Long, Christopher S. Rosenberry, Gary L. Alt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Master 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 40%
Environmental Science 10 19%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#13,747,230
of 24,217,496 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Monographs
#35
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,266
of 426,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Monographs
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them