↓ Skip to main content

Literacy, Pregnancy and Potential Oral Health Changes: The Internet and Readability Levels

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Literacy, Pregnancy and Potential Oral Health Changes: The Internet and Readability Levels
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10995-013-1290-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Constance Wiener, Regina Wiener-Pla

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the readability level and content of articles concerning pregnancy and the periodontium which are presented on internet websites. Websites were selected from Google, Yahoo, and Bing. The sites which were excluded were: commercial sites; blogs; dental office sites; sites with articles having fewer than 20 sentences; duplicated search results; and non-secure sites (N = 137). The grade level was determined from the SMOG reading index. Content was scored for specific pregnancy related periodontal content. The mean reading level was 8th grade. The mean number of words with 3 or more syllables in 20 sentences was 38.90. Articles written below the 8th grade level were more likely to recommend brushing twice a day and using a soft-bristled brush. Articles at or above the 8th grade level were more likely to discuss preterm birth and periodontal disease. One article from a national dental organization and 3 from government sites were returned from the searches. Internet articles are written across the literary spectrum. Dental organizations were not adequately represented. Many advertisements, .coms, and non-secure sites pose challenges in seeking health information. Although the internet is a useful tool, practitioners need to provide trustworthy, useful information during clinical visits and encourage national and state medical and dental organizations to provide content in response to search terms that would be typically used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 37%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Psychology 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,291,467
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#114
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,974
of 199,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.