↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of neonatal hypoglycaemia by oral lipid supplementation in low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, February 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Prevention of neonatal hypoglycaemia by oral lipid supplementation in low birth weight infants
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, February 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00442214
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Sann, B. Mousson, M. Rousson, I. Maire, M. Bethenod

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 43%
Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Engineering 2 29%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,896,310
of 23,934,148 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,559
of 3,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,840
of 50,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,934,148 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.