↓ Skip to main content

Depression, fracture risk, and bone loss: a meta-analysis of cohort studies

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Depression, fracture risk, and bone loss: a meta-analysis of cohort studies
Published in
Osteoporosis International, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00198-010-1181-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Q. Wu, J. Liu, J. F. Gallegos-Orozco, J. G. Hentz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 14 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 36%
Psychology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 21 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,377
of 3,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,658
of 93,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.