↓ Skip to main content

Hip fractures in France: The magnitude and perspective of the problem

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, May 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Hip fractures in France: The magnitude and perspective of the problem
Published in
Osteoporosis International, May 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01623756
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Baudoin, P. Fardellone, B. Thelot, R. Juvin, V. Potard, K. Bean, J. -L. Sebert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Sports and Recreations 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,377
of 3,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,413
of 27,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.