| Title |
An aggregation of lizard skeletons from the Lower Cretaceous of China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03043910 |
| Authors |
Susan E. Evans, Yuan Wang, Marc E. H. Jones |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#152
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,684
of 82,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them