| Title |
Closure of hip wound, clips or subcuticular sutures: does it make a difference?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00590-005-0043-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bijayendra Singh, M. A. S. Mowbray, G. Nunn, S. Mearns |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,960,738
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#30
of 880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,353
of 66,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 880 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them